Comments on: Be yourself http://c.matallin.com/2009/04/be-yourself/ geek, blogger, entrepreneur and web designer. Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:38:22 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Elasticity, putting web development and business together - Carlos Matallín http://c.matallin.com/2009/04/be-yourself/#comment-1453 Elasticity, putting web development and business together - Carlos Matallín Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:13:57 +0000 http://c.matallin.com/?p=516#comment-1453 [...] explain whatever you are dealing with much better and in a more intelligible way than you. Then I was talking about Punset and now I confirm this with a book I have recently read, Freakonomics. It doesn’t have a real [...] [...] explain whatever you are dealing with much better and in a more intelligible way than you. Then I was talking about Punset and now I confirm this with a book I have recently read, Freakonomics. It doesn’t have a real [...]

]]> By: johnymepeino http://c.matallin.com/2009/04/be-yourself/#comment-802 johnymepeino Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:01:28 +0000 http://c.matallin.com/?p=516#comment-802 How could anybody stop being oneself?. One possible answer could be: we have not come to discover "how I am in reality." If our cognition were the database (server), our behaviour would be the result of "a single algorithm" only: the only one thing we have learned to use (educational determinism). The results that the browser gives us (the graphical environment - visible) are just a few only, and not always the best results. In no event shall the total. But "we are all". We have got a risk: being an image without sound, or reading-myself without clicking on all my own links. Living satisfied with a simple code "all purpose". What happens when we are finished a new software, and we have forgotten "only" a simple " < " ?. What do we display?. And what comes on the screen?. Is that our program?. The answer is "no, it's isn't The unconscious keep under an invisible key (Encryption), everything our conscience can not support, (our mind does not use open source). The task is to know "who" isn't, "who is still without "being", (which still tell us "I can not be). If we know him, we can change the old way for understand ourselves, to see the life, and this would trigger a new form of behavior, perceptions, emotions, cognitions, and a new will be. (I hope that one day you can forgive me this authentic stone, that possibly made you say "in bad hour it occurred to me to post this issue") :D How could anybody stop being oneself?. One possible answer could be: we have not come to discover “how I am in reality.” If our cognition were the database (server), our behaviour would be the result of “a single algorithm” only: the only one thing we have learned to use (educational determinism). The results that the browser gives us (the graphical environment – visible) are just a few only, and not always the best results. In no event shall the total. But “we are all”.
We have got a risk: being an image without sound, or reading-myself without clicking on all my own links. Living satisfied with a simple code “all purpose”.

What happens when we are finished a new software, and we have forgotten “only” a simple ” < ” ?. What do we display?. And what comes on the screen?. Is that our program?. The answer is “no, it’s isn’t

The unconscious keep under an invisible key (Encryption), everything our conscience can not support, (our mind does not use open source).
The task is to know “who” isn’t, “who is still without “being”, (which still tell us “I can not be). If we know him, we can change the old way for understand ourselves, to see the life, and this would trigger a new form of behavior, perceptions, emotions, cognitions, and a new will be.

(I hope that one day you can forgive me this authentic stone, that possibly made you say “in bad hour it occurred to me to post this issue”) :D

]]>